@tomliv In the iOS app, you can toggle it per-post in with the gear icon on the post composition screen (though the text implies that it is āstickyā and will be remembered until you turn it on again). On the web, go to Account, Edit Feeds & Cross-posting, and press the Disable cross-posting button corresponding to the feed you want to turn off. Make your post, then turn it back on. // @help
(That said, this really needs to be a section in the Cross-posting help article.)
@smokey Thanks for the info. It would be nice to have a toggle in the post editor, across the board, to say āyesā or āno" to āCross-post this post?ā.
@tomliv No problem. The editor on the web has recently gotten the ability assign categories at posting time, so itās possible that toggling cross-posting will make its way to that button in the future, too. // @manton
@tomliv There's been a version of this feature request around for more than two years so you're certainly not alone! // @smokey
@simonwoods @tomliv @smokey I'm always worried about cluttering the posting screen, but now that we have the little "..." button that might be another place to put a cross-posting option. Because cross-posting works with any feed, this is less obvious a feature than it seems (and there's a work-around to just turn off cross-posting globally).
@manton @smokey @simonwoods maybe Iām just not in the āmicro.blog mindsetā yet. Iām struggling to not think of it as another Twitter or fb. I havenāt figured it out yet
@tomliv @manton @smokey Agree re: cluttering the settings. "Feature bloat" is one of my biggest worries for Micro.blog.
As for the mindset, Tom, I understand completely. Not only did I need some time to make adjustments but I've seen the vast majority of newcomers go through the same process. One of the good things about this is that it is a litmus for test with regard to how one thinks about the social web, silos and all.
@manton @simonwoods @smokey @tomliv I really think this needs to be a post by post selection with an easy interface. It should include disconnecting cross posting to MB. There are so many times I want to post to my blog and perhaps Twitter, but I don't want to post it to MB and I have to let the thought go because I'm not going to, in effect, crawl down to the basement and pull a fuse just for one post. Which is what I feel I have to do now.
@bradenslen @manton @smokey Agreed. Set the main preference, set up where to cross-post to (Twitter, etc) but have a post-by-post option to include the other platforms.
@bradenslen @simonwoods @smokey @tomliv Thanks for the feedback. We would have to find a way to do this without making it even more confusing. I'd love to simplify it because already people are confused about how feeds work today.
@bradenslen Really? I'm curious how it would add value... To me, cross-posting is a compatibility feature to make it easier to keep one foot in the big social networks, but isn't directly related to hosted blogs at all.
@manton @bradenslen I agree. The separation of cross-posting from the blog part of the hosted accounts is important, since Micro.blog is not just another blog hosting option and the non-blog features ought to retain their independence from the blog hosting.
@manton @simonwoods The cross posting is a great feature, but choice is also a value along with selectivity of audience. I view the social network side of MB as an interesting but placid dinner party and as a proper dinner guest I don't want to bring up those dredded 3 topics I was taught to avoid (religion, politics and sex.) Because, I like and respect the MB community I'm a part of and don't want to be seen as trolling. Twitter is a different audience and I don't mind giving it a good straifing run now and then. OTOH, I'm a blogger and sometimes I want to get a bit ranty on the blog (and probably Twitter) but not on MB. So what I'd like is an off switch where for an individual post I can selectively turn off posting to MB (or Twitter) for just that post.
My original goal was to make my MB blog my common place book, but I want the blog to be that not necessarily the MB feed. The pressure I'm feeling is that I need to start a seperate blog for politics, current affairs when I really want to keep everything on one blog.
It's a lot of extra work, right now, to go down into the admin panel, disconnect MB and/or Twitter, make my post, then go back into the admin panel and reactivate my defaults.
@bradenslen Agree with a lot of what you're saying. Still a little unsure about making the Micro.blog just another broadcasting target. Either way I still prefer the cross-posting to not be exclusively tied up with the blog hosting; right now it is a hosted feature, since it can also work with external feeds, and I like that a lot. // @manton
@bradenslen I really like the way youāre thinking about this. I also really like the way @manton is trying to keep the posting process āfrictionless.ā
@bradenslen @manton If it helps, I think what Brad is describing is a different sort of friction: a desire to ālet looseā a post, but not at the dinner table of his micro.blog readership. I wouldnāt mind, but some would and I think itās very considerate of him to think of that.
@fgtech @bradenslen This gives me something to think about, thanks. It's not how I personally use my blog so I appreciate the perspective.
@bradenslen @manton @simonwoods @fgtech Bradās points echo my thoughts earlier this year about intentional sharing and community norms, and it feels like thereās just a little bit of missing flexibilty with hosted blogs to facilitate that; Bradās not the first person Iāve encountered trying to figure out a good way to post something to the blog but keep it off the Timeline and related. Of course, the devil is in the (implementation/UI) detailsāparticularly here since a feed going into M.b-the-social-space is also needed for cross-posting to corporate social silosā¦.
@bix Just saw this counterpoint via @smokeyās note. I think the āself-selected-followers-as-filterā idea is what most have come to accept since itās Twitterās stance. But itās all or nothing. I think we could do better by enabling thoughtfulness from people like @bradenslen.
@smokey Thank you for linking in the intentional sharing post. I had missed that before and like the nuance it adds to my thinking about this. I think @bradenslenās request definitely fits under the heading of intentional sharing.
@bix It may not be relevant to you, really. As @manton said, this is not the way he uses his blog.
@bix My take on the idea is nuanced and really deserves its own blog post, but it boils down to: I donāt want every post I write to wind up in the micro.blog feeds of my followers. It should be easy to toggle that āsyndication" off when I post.
@bix That's the nuance.
Fart jokes are not acceptable at our dinner table, but allowed in the bathroom. The lurking aspect is about āreading the room" to understand the accepted norms of a particular online forum before posting anything.
@bix The lurking reference was only one part of the larger thrust arguing that we should understand and respect a communityās rules and norms, and I maintain that, as bloggers, we should only share/syndicate content thatās appropriate for the community. Even if someone has no followers, their posts still become part of the community (and, on Micro.blog, are exposed in several ways: the personās profile, the Discover tagmoji sections, and, potentially, the manual Discover sectionāvia the all-posts feed; Manton and Jean and any future co-curators will always have to see your posts), and those posts reflect on the community to anyone finds them. If someone new/looking sees that there are a bunch of people on Micro.blog who only post, say, checkins and their Twitter like history, the visitor is not going to think Micro.blog is a good place for blogging.
It also applies in Bradās case (and, I believe, in the case that prompted my intentional sharing post) when an existing member considers/decides to share a new type of content to the Timeline, whether as āpostsā on oneās own blog or some other feed related to that person. There are no rules against politics, but our norms seem to have settled on a certain careful, moderated approach to them (and Brad thought he would be making some number of ātrollingā posts that would violate those norms). Likewise, our norms have coalesced around not sharing every single daily checkin/Twitter like/bookmark/read post, so deciding to hook those up to your Micro.blog account once you set them up on your website would āviolateā our norms, regardless of whether you had any followers (and if you did have some, they would be doubly annoyed by the change in post composition that also goes contrary to our norms).
Or, to put it another way, we donāt want any weeds in the garden, regardless of whether theyāre in a part of the garden no one sees; their presence in the garden is a bad thing in and of itself, and we all should be careful not to bring weed seeds into the garden when we come and visit.
(Iām not sure if that has made things any clearer or not; the path from my brain to the screen has more rocks on it than I expected.) // @fgtech
@smokey I agree with your intentional sharing post and what you have written here. I do have a slightly different perspective: I think the blog hosting part of MB should have the option of standing alone as just a blog, without every post being welded into the MB social network. If I remember right, even on Facebook, you have some control over who can see a given post in the timeline: ie. Close Friends, Followers, Everyone, etc. I'm not advocating that here but it is a form of intentional sharing.
(IMHO there are some other features needed to make the hosted blogs more stand alone: option for Comments on the blog would be one, option to receive replies from non-hosted blogs is another.)
There is a commercial aspect to this too: it's the blog hosting that supports MB financially. The more the hosted blogs can stand on their own compared to the competition the more people will stay with their MB hosted blog rather than switching to some other blog platform like Wordpress. Maybe I'm too old school, but I evaluate any blog platform based upon the feature set irregardless of social networks, how easy it is to impliment the features, and how much control I have over my blog. I also recognize that implementing those things are not easy. I also recognize that @manton has thought about all this, if it were a chess game, many more moves out than I'm capable of and I trust his judgement.
@smokey I agree with @bix that this sounds a little āover-zealous.ā My blog and its content come first, and communities/norms/rules come second. I own my content: I post it on my blog, which is out on the Internet, visible to anyone in the universe with a browser. Itās not exclusively a part of Micro.blog, even if itās a M.b-hosted blog. That my posts are also accessible to M.b folks who have chosen to integrate them into their timelines by āfollowingā me is of secondary concern to me. (They donāt want to hear my incessant fart jokes anymore? Okay: they can mute me, or unfollow me. Or they could actually engage with me, asking whatās the deal with all these fart jokes? ā or, at worst, they can report me.)
I think this conversation got muddy when people started talking about why they might want only some of their content to feed into Micro.blog. I donāt care about the āwhy,ā and Iām not sure why anyone else does either (especially since thereās no single ābecauseā). I only care about the functionality thatās being discussed: Can I selectively cross-post my M.b content to other services, can I selectively cross-post content from other services to M.b, and can I do this easily?
(Apologies if Iām missing something here, because Iāve read through this conversation several times, and I keep feeling like I might be missing something.)
(And please be mindful of the āweedā metaphor. āWeedā is a problematic category, defined solely by a thingās perceived value and usefulness. Neither an algorithm nor a communityās rules and norms can predict or accurately prescribe what Iām going to find valuable or useful. Heck, most of the time, even I canāt predict what Iāll find valuable or usefulā¦ So: let in the weeds!)
@bix @smokey Confession: The norm that only certain content is welcome on MB has influenced my decision to spend more time on Wordpress and Twitter, compared to MB. Iām very fond of the community here and I respect it. But the tone is kinda dinner at Grandmas and I didnāt want to distress ppl with my swearing and memes and politics. Then I got tired of maintaining multiple online presences... and well, long story short, thatās why I post here less often. This isnāt a complaint, BTW. Just another data point. š
@bradenslen for me it comes down to this: nevermind the why, but as a paying m.b user i'd simply like to have the option of posting to my blog without every post appearing in the timeline. and it should be as easy as toggling a button when i'm writing a post.
of course, i could pull my feed from the timeline and then actively refeed selected posts to m.b via my pinboard rss (something i've experimented with) -- but it should be easier than this.
@bix Yes, exactly, that was my impression, too. I wasnāt quite sure why the conversation shifted the way it did. I mean, okay, Iām glad people are so thoughtful and mindful, it implies they all really respect this community, and thatās great. But communities are shaped by the individuals who show up and participate, so Iād hate to think that interesting people were self-censoring themselves, or even deciding not join in the first place, simply because itās all too ādinner at Grandmaāsā for them (as @cheri so aptly puts it ā an impression of M.b I sometimes have, too, by the way)ā¦
@tones I would like to learn more about how you "... actively refeed selected posts to m.b via my pinboard rss".
@khurtwilliams save the the selected post to pinboard, give it a certain tag there, and then feed that tag's rss to m.b. clunky but effective.
@Cheri "dinner at Grandmas" is such a perfect analogy. Your post summed up a lot of what I was thinking but I had never formed into words. (And I don't mean to complain, either. Just saying this resonates.) š
@tones I'll give that a try. I don't want everything I post on my WordPress websit to go to m.b.
@tomliv This is a meaty and very valuable thread. One of my first wishes (1.5 years ago?) after joining MB was an easy way to control cross-posting on each post. Some small steps closer since then but NTY.
I am very glad this community is a place where there can be a grandma sort of timeline but I agree it shouldnāt just be for grandma (I tend to think of it more like the timeline is safe for a corporate dinner, some grandmas arenāt so shy! and letās not be sexist). Iād like to see an expansion of topics while at the same time still enforcing requirements for civility in discourse. I hope those arenāt mutually exclusive. Iāve seen some long threads of disagreement which remained civil so that encourages me.
I tend to think the suggestions on this thread would help expand the diversity of the community (again, as long as a degree of civility is maintained). I know I avoid posting on a range of topics because of the āgrandmaā factor as well as the lack of diversity (meaning certain topics just go into a black hole).
@ronguest At one time I spent a looong time in private emails trying to get "civility in discourse" included as one of the standards for posting here. I did not succeed, perhaps because it might then raise the issue of how would it be enforced or should it be? With a tiny staff, we can probably never expect such standards to ever be required. Civility is only enforced by the community as a "norm" not by an explicit requirement in the rules. As long as this is a tiny community with a tiny staff, I concluded we cannot expect any more than that.
@ronguest @macgenie @manton Um, wow. This post blew up. Didnāt see that coming. I mean, Iām just an MB noob who noticed a lacking feature. I donāt want posts here going to my Twitter feed. I am just not feeling they have the same purpose. And as someone in the thread mentioned - sorry I can remember who and thereās no reply all - I donāt want to take a trip to the basement to pull a fuse so I can keep a post from going all over the internet.
That said, I am impressed by the thoughtfulness of everyone and itās a perfect example why Iād rather not have places like the Twitterverse constantly connected to what I post here.
I think itās safe to say all or most agree that more cross-posting control would be nice to have.
@bradenslen I agree about evaluating features and that should continue to be a focus for us. It is possible to use Micro.blog for blogging only and disconnect it from the timeline, but that also removes the cross-posting to Twitter, etc. We're probably missing some options in the middle between "all" and "nothing".
@bix @smokey @bradenslen, et all.: Wow, this has really flared into a passionate discussion! Iāll have more thoughts to add but Iām having a busy week and it will take some time to get it down. This topic is nuanced and will require the focus of a blog post to capture all facets.
@fgtech @tomliv @ronguest @macgenie @manton @ronguest @khurtwilliams @bix I donāt want to revive this thread, but one aspect Iād like to add to the cross-posting conversation is that of relevancy: my MB and Twitter followers might care how my day is going, but my professional contacts on LinkedIn probably donāt. If I have a general question for the MB community, that wonāt be relevant to my Mastodon followers. To me, it makes more sense to toggle cross-posting on the post screen in apps/web, if I want to more permanently disable cross-posting for an entire feed, I already can do that under account settings. I also apologize if things have changed since this thread happened last October, I wasnāt able to find updated information, so assume the state of this has not changed since then.
@SteveSawczyn The only thing new is that it's possible to use category feeds to control cross-posting, but it's a hassle to manage. For now, it's still best to disable it when you need to and manually cross-post.
@manton Do feeds always appear in the MB timeline even if cross-posting is disabled? Put another way, if I disable cross-posting on my feed temporarily so it doesn't share to Twitter and other services, will people who follow me here on micro.blog still see it?
@SteveSawczyn Yes, if a feed appears on your account, it will show up in the Micro.blog timeline. I wrote a blog post recently about using separate feeds to control this.
@SteveSawczyn it's still a challenge for me. I do want my Untappd checks-in to flow here but when I drink a set of session ales I often forget to disable the feed in Micro.blog. I created separate feeds for cross-posting from WordPress but ideally I would prefer to toggle posting to Micro.blog from WordPress at the time of post.
@manton This is absolutely fantastic, thanks for this. I think I need to reconfigure some feeds though as if I want to -- say share with MB and Twitter, but not LinkedIn, I can't disable cross-posting as then it won't share to Twitter. I suspect the solution is to add my feed multiple times, adding Twitter to one instance, LinkedIn to another instance, everything to the third instance. I'm trying to balance over complicating things with being respectful of the various audiences to whom i might cross-post. :). Thanks for all the help with this, I really appreciate it.
@SteveSawczyn One gotcha to keep in mind: currently the same post can't exist in more than 1 feed or cross-posting does not work consistently. I've been considering how to work around this.
@khurtwilliams Yep, I definitely would love more granular control. One thing I'm sort of playing with is the idea of excluding certain categories from the feed that's shared with micro.blog on the WordPress side. Then I just have to make sure my posts are assigned to that category, something like NoMB. Not quite as intuitive as I'd like, but the category list is easy to get to from the post screen on the WordPress side.
@manton Yeah, the user would essentially have to build a matrix of possible combinations such that a post only would exist in one feed. Fortunately, this is probably an extreme edge case scenario for most.
@manton So I just disabled cross-posting, wrote a post here on MB, then re-enabled cross-posting: the post wound up going to Twitter and Mastodon. Only thing I can imagine is that I re-enabled cross-posting too quickly? Can't think of any other reason this would have happened. Does that make sense, or should I have done things in a different way? I promise I'm almost done with this cross-posting conversation. :)
@SteveSawczyn Yeah, enabling before it finished sending to Twitter is the most likely reason. It has to stay disabled until Micro.blog finishes checking the feeds for cross-posting, since it doesn't yet actually store the setting for any particular post.