smokey
smokey

This Week on Micro.blog 2018 W42 šŸ—“ļø

|
Embed
Progress spinner
seishonagon
seishonagon

@smokey thanks - you’re too kind!

|
Embed
Progress spinner
SimonWoods
SimonWoods

@smokey šŸ™Œā­

|
Embed
Progress spinner
smokey
smokey

@seishonagon It was a really striking shot šŸ‘

|
Embed
Progress spinner
smokey
smokey

@vasta I can’t take credit for the camera emoji; @johnjohnston used it last week in his recap and I thought it was a good way to link to photo posts without using too many characters. Glad you enjoyed the list!

|
Embed
Progress spinner
smokey
smokey

@simonwoods Thanks, Simon!

|
Embed
Progress spinner
smokey
smokey

@rnv Thanks! As I said to Sameer, credit for the camera idea goes to @johnjohnston.

I’ve found myself lots of times in the middle of a fight between the idea that we’re blogging and a blog post ought to be complete and travel together, on the one hand, and the fact that people don’t tend to follow links to original posts and want to see everything in 280 characters in the Timeline, which calls for splitting an argument or thought into a series of 280-character bits, on the other hand.

If you have slightly different foci for the parts, there’s at least a logical reason supporting division.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Bruce
Bruce

@smokey For longer replies, I’ve been writing titleless posts to my microblog then linking to them in a short reply on the discussion thread. That seems to have worked fairly well so far.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
adamprocter
adamprocter

@smokey nice

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
smokey
smokey

@adamprocter Glad you liked it, Adam :-)

|
Embed
Progress spinner
smokey
smokey

@Bruce Yeah, I think for existing conversations where participants are already invested in the subject what you’ve been doing works well.

My grumbling was more about initial posts, and in particular where you have >280 and <~512-1024 characters worth to say about a given subject…it’s too long for a single inline micropost, but maybe not really ā€œlong enoughā€ for a traditional blog post, but ā€œpart 2ā€ also has an important point that you don’t want to get lost being an elipsis+domain name link…there we tend to default to 2 separate posts, so both on this platform and on your blog, the 2 parts are disconnected from each other, forever, and discussion may also be fragmented between the separate parts, rather than looking at the argument as a whole…. (Or, in this specific case, your ā€œweekly reviewā€œ is half a weekly review + another half a weekly review….)

|
Embed
Progress spinner