pratik
pratik

@jasonekratz Agree about “bloody revolution” being politics too, except I was hoping we wouldn’t get there. I don’t think Andreessen-Horowitz just got this, but in light of DHH’s proclamations, at least we got them to explicitly and openly state that politics is essential to getting your way. Now they may have been already doing that in the shadows via PACs.

Re: my quote about Ben, I still don’t understand your point. It’s clear I was talking about him being a privileged (legacy/social capital) rich white man. I didn’t even think about his religion but yes, I would put an American privileged straight white rich Christian man at the top of the food chain. But unless Ben tells us more about how he is being misrepresented in this world, you and I can only guess. I don’t know about his family history and his Wikipedia entry is scant on details.

Re: NY resolutions, of course, people should do what’s best for their mental health, but some of us don’t have that privilege or the choice so I was just pointing it out. If they feel guilty about me pointing that out, well, I can’t dictate how they should feel.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
moonmehta
moonmehta

@manton @jean I haven’t read, or rather remember, many of @pratik’s posts to say anything about if I think he violated the Community Guidelines or not. But I did want to chime in say that I agree that if the accusation was made publicly, the decision should be public too. I’m sure either Pratik or @rcrackley would be willing to course correct as needed, or use their free will to act in ways best for them while being compliant with the community.

|
Embed
Progress spinner