baldur
baldur

ā€œCan We Trust Search Engines with Generative AI? A Closer Look at Bingā€™s Accuracy for News Querieā€

Sometimes the references simply do not support the claim being made

|
Embed
pimoore
pimoore

@baldur I donā€™t like this one iota. What decent search alternatives are there at this point, not using Google or Bing? Iā€™ve tried others and they were mediocre at best.

|
Embed
Archimage
Archimage

@pimoore DuckDuckGo

|
Embed
jasonmcfadden
jasonmcfadden

@pimoore I've been using DuckDuckGo for years and it's been very good.

|
Embed
baldur
baldur

@pimoore A lot of people are going to recommend DuckDuckGo, but they are using Bing's search engine under the hood, so whatever service deterioration that happens to Bing will eventually migrate to DDG. And, yeah, there kind of aren't any good options out there for search. It's a duopoly where the competing parties clearly have a tacit unofficiall agreement not to make improvements that threaten profitability.

|
Embed
pimoore
pimoore

@baldur @jasonmcfadden @Archimage Thatā€™s exactly the problem. Iā€™ve been using DDG for years now, and itā€™s one of the big two engines. Based on the article, I suppose the workaround is to not use search for news-related content. That still doesnā€™t mean the AI produced results arenā€™t going to further permeate into these search engines, and make the situation worse.

From my past testing, Qwantā€™s results were subpar, as were Ecosiaā€™s (the latter of which is also Bing I believe). Iā€™ve heard good things about Mojeek, but also that itā€™s very specific in terms of its search strengths. Not sure what the long term answer is at this point.

|
Embed
In reply to
Denny
Denny

@pimoore @baldur @jasonmcfadden @Archimage So, I was going to make a joke about excite.com and altavista.com. Turns out, excite still works! Not sure what the search results are based on but the page of results I got was surpriningly simple and clutter free. Altavista redirects to yahoo which I've not used in a long time. šŸ¤£ I've reset my Safari default to Yahoo as an experiment. But like others, have been using DDG. Before that I'd tried Bing a few years back and used it for a year or so as an effort to move away from Google. I still have a GMail account but don't use it much and have largely cut google out of the loop.

|
Embed
mbkriegh
mbkriegh

@pimoore doesnā€™t Wolfram have a search engine?

|
Embed
wfm
wfm

@Archimage Duckduckgo is essentially Bing under the hood.

|
Embed
mbkriegh
mbkriegh

@pimoore WolframAlpha is a somewhat specialized search engineā€¦

|
Embed
odd
odd

@Denny @baldur @pimoore I so wish Apple would go into the search engine space, and not use it for business, just accurate and safe search. It wonā€™t happen thoughā€¦ I kind of miss the old AltaVista.

|
Embed
restlesslens
restlesslens

@Denny @pimoore @baldur @jasonmcfadden @Archimage Iā€™ve been playing with Brave search, which doesnā€™t seem to have a business model beyond an ad-replacing attention token for the companyā€™s browser, and Neeva, which has a sold pay-to-use model but is jumping on the AI bandwagon too. Iā€™m still wading through all the privacy fine print, strengths/weaknesses, etc. and havenā€™t decided what I think about them. Anyone else try these? Search engines are apparently hard to do?

|
Embed
mbkriegh
mbkriegh

@pimoore been looking at the options for search engines and came across Brave Search which is currently in Beta. Itā€™s a privacy oriented search engine with itā€™s own index. I have been using Brave browser and liking it.

|
Embed
Denny
Denny

@restlesslens @mbkriegh @pimoore @baldur @jasonmcfadden @Archimage I'd tried Brave a while back but didn't stick with it. The visual layout is nice, easy to read. Good to know it's based on their own index. Just a couple of searches and it seems to yield good results.

|
Embed
toddgrotenhuis
toddgrotenhuis

@baldur Iā€™ve found Neeva to work well, and its AI function cites its references, too.

|
Embed
pratik
pratik

@Denny OMG excite.com still exists!!! A tangential aside. In the early days, when someone got overly excited, I had this habit of saying, why are you so excite.com? Reading your comment just brought those memories rushing back šŸ˜†

|
Embed
llbbl
llbbl

@pimoore @baldur @jasonmcfadden @Archimage - If you use Ecosia, you also help save the planet by planting trees. That is my primary search engine. I switched to it from DuckDuckGo because of their mission.

I'll probably use the new Bing some of the time because chatgpt is incredibly useful. I don't like Google search anymore. I don't like that so much of their revenue comes from advertising.

|
Embed
JohnBrady
JohnBrady

@pimoore I use Brave Search all the time. Good and steadily getting better in my experience. (But then my search needs are pretty run-of-the-mill.)

|
Embed
Aywren
Aywren

@llbbl This is a great idea. I wasn't aware of Ecosia - going to try it now. Thanks for the suggestion!

|
Embed
jasonmcfadden
jasonmcfadden

@baldur Thatā€™s right. Iā€™d forgotten DDG uses Bing. Good point. Tough question but good conversation. Aside: I was about to try the DDG browser for Mac šŸ¤” Edit: Think Iā€™ll look at Brave search.

|
Embed
Aywren
Aywren

@jasonmcfadden I've used the Brave browser and search and found it pretty nice.

|
Embed
jeroensangers
jeroensangers

@odd Altavistaā€™s search results were not that great. There is a reason Google was able to come out of nowhere and take over the dominant position in no time.

|
Embed
Clonmeldigital
Clonmeldigital

@odd To search and find results with high degrees of accuracy, I had to compare Alta Vista to Excite to Hotbot to Dogpile. Google in alpha did all that for me decades ago.

|
Embed
odd
odd

@jeroensangers I might project my nostalgia onto this. Yes, Google used to be great, but that was them positioning themselves to be ā€œomnipotentā€.

|
Embed
odd
odd

@Clonmeldigital Yes, I guess they used to be great, but thatā€™s a long time ago.

|
Embed