adamprocter
adamprocter

Digital Gardening for Non-Technical Folks dctr.pro/2li via @johnjohnston

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
warner
warner

@adamprocter I don’t fully understand the hype about “digital gardens” (solo wikis?), but I know @jasraj & @chrisaldrich both into it

|
Embed
Progress spinner
adamprocter
adamprocter

@w4rner I think it’s just a new way of talking about working openly so I’m all for that 👍

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jasraj
jasraj

@w4rner I just use it to describe my presence online (e.g. someone finds INF Club… then browsers deeper into my “garden” to find my micro blog). My own garden (INF club) needs tidying up a wee bit to make it more accessible (now & then the leaves need to be cut back & tidied up!)

|
Embed
Progress spinner
warner
warner

@jasraj @adamprocter M.b = “The Secret Garden” ⛲️🌳 those who need to find it

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jasraj
jasraj

@w4rner @adamproctor I love the phrase ‘digital garden’… it makes me think of a happy place to be slowly explored & discovered. ps. great writeup, Adam. Interesting to think we can each leave our own online imprint that’ll last beyond our lifetimes. Tools like Notion & Roam Research are making it easier to neatly ‘document’ things.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jasraj
jasraj

@jasraj whoops* @adamprocter, the above comment was meant for you^

|
Embed
Progress spinner
adamprocter
adamprocter

@w4rner @jasraj 👍

|
Embed
Progress spinner
warner
warner

@jasraj I really rate the language of “tended to” for updating a living doc. I also think tagging “Evergreen” vs. “timely” is promising, though a lot of stuff is hard to know in advance.
I prefer manually adding update dates:

  • to blog posts when I make an edit
  • the year in a website’s ‘license’ (usually copyright) as a signal you’ve updated it that calendar year
|
Embed
Progress spinner