@ridwan Quoran and Horoscope quotes are NOT science. They are religion/philosophy (Quoran) and social-engineering (Horoscopes).
@ridwan Science:
: knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method b : such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena : NATURAL SCIENCE
Religious belief:
: a state or habit of mind in which trust or confidence is placed in some person or thing her belief in God a belief in democracy I bought the table in the belief that it was an antique. contrary to popular belief 2 : something that is accepted, considered to be true, or held as an opinion : something believed an individual's religious or political beliefs especially : a tenet or body of tenets held by a group the beliefs of the Catholic Church
Have a nice day. I’m not going to debate. I have nothing against any religion unless they claim it is science.
@ridwan And I’m not saying the Quoran does claim it is science, I’m claiming the RAPIDAPI web page thinks it is.
@ridwan what @archimage wrote ... for me it wasn't even anything to do with The Quran - and everything to do with Horoscopes being classified as 'science'.
Astrology consists of a number of belief systems that hold that there is a relationship between astronomical phenomena and events or descriptions of personality in the human world. Astrology has been rejected by the scientific community as having no explanatory power for describing the universe. Scientific testing has found no evidence to support the premises or purported effects outlined in astrological traditions.
<p class="attribution">💬 Wikipedia </p>
(my bold)
@pratik Why do you even ask such silly questions? There is no need to extend this kind of conversation. Doesn't lead to anything useful.