manton
manton
Pixelfed cross-posting in Micro.blog manton.org
|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@jzfski I think we're going to stick with encouraging text replies. But you can upload a photo separately now from the Uploads screen and then copy/paste a link into a reply and it will work.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jtr
jtr

@manton Awesome! Now I need to play with Glass RSS feeds and I think I'll have a nice photography upgrade to my blog.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jemostrom
jemostrom

@manton I assume this doesn't work if I upload using Mimi and then create a post in the micro.blog client with a link to the photo?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Archimage
Archimage

@timapple @manton Ditto. Thank you.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
pratik
pratik

@jtr @manton We are trying to convince Glass to use ActivityPub. Om Malik also made a recommendation on our behalf to the CEO. Also, I think Manton is working on importing the photo that we post on Glass to Micro.blog instead of just linking to it on Glass. That effectively would serve as a backup to anything we post to Glass and be posted on your blog.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@jemostrom That actually does work! There's not really a difference between uploading the photo from Mimi as far as Micro.blog is concerned.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
moonmehta
moonmehta

@manton Tangent related to Pixelfed from their recent blog post introducing Sign-in with Mastodon:

By opting to sign up with Mastodon, your avatar, bio, username, and accounts you follow on Mastodon are automatically pre-filled on Pixelfed, saving you time and effort.

This seems something Micro.blog could do for Mastodon users wanting to explore the platform. It could include importing posts and optionally redirecting their Mastodon accounts too to make the whole process even more seamless!

|
Embed
Progress spinner
pajp
pajp

@manton this is a rather frustrating limitation that bothers me quite often. Attaching a photo to a reply is such a useful thing to do, especially in support/troubleshooting conversation.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
JohnPhilpin
JohnPhilpin

@pajp

Pretty Simple

// @manton

|
Embed
Progress spinner
pajp
pajp

@JohnPhilpin if it’s that simple to do with markup, that makes it even more silly that it’s not available in the client.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@pajp I hear you, and I know a lot of people agree. However, I remain of the opinion that too many image replies will lead to a busy timeline, full of memes and animated GIFs, making real conversations harder. Of course the occasional image is totally fine, which is why it's possible, but I think encouraging text replies is for the best. We reconsider this decision probably once a year and will reconsider it again!

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@moonmehta That is interesting. I used to dislike basing sign-in on another platform (i.e. see what happened with Twitter) but I could see making an exception for something open like Mastodon.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
crlzff
crlzff

@manton Maybe OT, but since Pixelfed is based on ActivityPub, can I follow a Pixelfed account from Micro.blog? Or it’s just limited to Mastodon? And viceversa, I mean being followed by a Pixelfed account? (I guess that wouldn’t because of post type, text vs image based)

|
Embed
Progress spinner
ryanbooker
ryanbooker

@manton Great news! Thanks. :)

|
Embed
Progress spinner
JohnPhilpin
JohnPhilpin

@pajp Maybe ... and .. not to speak for Manton but

Manton is being very considered and deliberate around the choices he has made building out the Micro Blog platform. His decisions might not always seem great when observed through a particular lens - trust me - been there! BUT his focus is as much (if not more) around culture and the emerging community as it is around technology. In this particular case, making it just slightly more inconvenient to post images in replies is enough to maybe make us a little more considered around the dialogues than otherwise. (I think this is also part of why 'no likes'.)

For me I don’t always agree with what features he may or may not add to the platform but I am truly impressed by his consistency in seeking to build something of quality with consideration and not just plucking easy wins out of a tech stack.

I think this quick 2*2 is a good summary of that proposition. Over to @manton if he so desires.

https://john.philpin.com/uploads/2023/cleanshot-2023-08-07-at-14.24.372x.png

|
Embed
Progress spinner
pratik
pratik

@JohnPhilpin @pajp Agree. I think the way it is currently structured as a compromise is good. Mb does not allow direct uploading images to replies, but you can add it first to the Uploads and then link to it via the Markdown or HTML code in your reply that you get with a right click/long-press. This level of intentional friction doesn't prevent you from doing what you want and limits it to the user who really wants to. @manton

|
Embed
Progress spinner
mcg
mcg

@pratik Nothing in the MB API would stop a 3rd party client from adding images in replies, as easily as posts. I’ve often wondered what the response would be to this.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
pratik
pratik

@mcg There wouldn’t. But there are very few third-party apps. Gluon is one. But the developer now also works on the official one.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jemostrom
jemostrom

@jemostrom 👍🏻🌟

|
Embed
Progress spinner
numericcitizen
numericcitizen

@manton I ❤️U

|
Embed
Progress spinner
markstoneman
markstoneman

@manton How does Micro.blog know when a post should be cross-posted to Pixelfed? And what parts of the post does it send over or drop? This feels like a situation where it might be better to have Pixelfed added to the options in the crosspost dropdown menu we can use for crossposting after the fact.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
markstoneman
markstoneman

@manton Just to add, I'm coming at this from a place where checkboxes for each service are not available, i.e., MarsEdit.

|
Embed
Progress spinner