manton
manton

I don’t believe anyone should own or run Twitter, Mastodon, or Bluesky. It wants to be a public good at a protocol level, not a company. Solving for the problem of it being a company however, Jay Graber is the singular solution I trust.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jcsalterego.bsky.social
jcsalterego.bsky.social

@manton TW: the wording

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
pcora
pcora

@manton of all proposed solutions, protocols, ideas, whatever, AT Protocol seems the nicest and we’ll build. I know there is a lot to Activitypub, but it seem so unreachable for some reason..

|
Embed
Progress spinner
samonthewebs.com
samonthewebs.com

@manton Isn’t that effectively what bluesky is? The company is effectively a UI wrapper for the protocol, but it’s open source

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bobcalder.bsky.social
bobcalder.bsky.social

@manton Yay! Found you. So Mastodon. Here on bsky you can smell the danger like you can smell a fire at the neighbor’s house. I visited a couple of sites of what you might call infection yesterday. Not good.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton.org
manton.org

@manton I figured not everyone would get where this quote came from, but it sort of works either way.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
sebastix.bsky.social
sebastix.bsky.social

@manton Nostr?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jthingelstad
jthingelstad

@manton I’d like to agree with you but it is notable to me that even protocols can be usurped. Take the incredibly open world of email and SMTP, IMAP, etc. which Google has captured in Gmail. Just highlighting protocols by themselves do not guarantee open-ness.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
joeross@mastodon.social
joeross@mastodon.social

@manton I see what you did there. Well played. And, the reference aside, correct.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
SimonWoods
SimonWoods

@manton I hate that I know the quote by the rhythm in the phrase but not well enough to identify it exactly.

|
Embed
Progress spinner