SuperMoof
SuperMoof

It appears that the new wavelength app requires a hosted micro.blog site. Is that correct or am I missing something? I currently link a wordpress blog to this service…

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@SuperMoof That's correct. We started with Micro.blog since it's simpler and gets the user a full podcast feed without any extra plugins or configuration.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
deverman
deverman

@manton I would like to pay you to support my wordpress microblog and allow things like podcasting. Trying to not use a systems that I don’t ultimately control so not sold on micro.blog. However I know this might not be a scalable for you to serve me.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
manton
manton

@deverman I've considered a kind of WordPress support plan, but I'm not sure if people would pay or what the right price would be. (By the way, you can disable that "this post first appeared" in the Yoast SEO plugin.)

|
Embed
Progress spinner
rosemaryorchard
rosemaryorchard

@manton I like the sound of that. Maybe a Jekyll one could follow?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
colinwalker
colinwalker

@manton Need support staff? 😆

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jackwellborn
jackwellborn

@manton My preference would be to keep pricing simply “pay Micro.blog when you want the best microblog hosting.” Charging for hosting additional features because they’re exclusive to Micro.blog is messy and smells of “embrace, extend, extinguish" (unintentional as it would be.)

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@jackwellborn I think I agree, but I'm also not entirely sure what you mean by "additional features because they're exclusive". Can you elaborate?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jackwellborn
jackwellborn

@manton Currently it seems Micro.blog is a leader that also has the goal of lowering the bar to support microblogs on other hosts. In my mind, features risk becoming "exclusive” if the bar to support them on other hosts becomes too high. Does that help?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
SuperMoof
SuperMoof

@manton Thanks for letting me know so quickly.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@jackwellborn I think I see where you're going, but also there's only so much we can do to improve other people's blog software. The basics are universal: blog post without a title. Anything else is a bonus and usually optional.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
johnbrayton
johnbrayton

@manton +1. I keep considering moving my microblog to my own server, mostly so I can be a control freak about it. But I would happily continue paying for the service. I want badly for it to succeed. ;-)

|
Embed
Progress spinner
deverman
deverman

@manton Thanks I have disabled "this post first appeared". I am still trying to forumlate what I think is the product I'm looking for in my personal and maybe my business life for communication.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
pyrmont
pyrmont

@manton Another +1 about paying for non-hosted accounts. I'd honestly happily pay the same price without receiving anything 'extra'. Whatever the price, I'd request it be open to any compatible blog, not just WordPress (I'm considering using @gerwitz's Sitewriter).

|
Embed
Progress spinner
gerwitz
gerwitz

@pyrmont I've de-prioritized Twitter and Facebook syndication specifically because I like having to pay for micro.blog to do it. I'd rather just pay for micro.blog itself!

|
Embed
Progress spinner
pyrmont
pyrmont

@gerwitz Yeah, I have no interest in syndication. I can see it's useful for others but not something I care to do.

|
Embed
Progress spinner