frankm
frankm

I wonder, back in the day, how many articles were written to explain Facebook and Twitter to people and convince them to use it? I am thinking that if someone has to write an article to explain a social network, it’s too complicated and will not draw lots of people. (Exhibit A: Google+)

|
Embed
In reply to
manton
manton

@frankm It's easy to forget, but I think there were quite a few around 2007-2008. I remember trying to convince people to use Twitter. Many people didn't get it.

|
Embed
aaronpk
aaronpk

@manton Not even that long ago! https://www.wired.com/2016/05/twitter-onboarding-tips-for-new-users/ (2016) https://www.lifewire.com/tutorial-intro-to-using-twitter-2654622 (2018)

|
Embed
manton
manton

@aaronpk Wow, you're right! (And I really need to fix HTML parsing from Webmentions. Sigh.)

|
Embed
roelwillems
roelwillems

@manton @frankm This conversation brings back memories when I first joined Twitter and for quite some time having no clue what to do, post or who to follow. I whished someone back then wrote a guide ;-)

|
Embed
the
the

@manton Me too! I spent a lot of time trying to convince businesses I work with and local organizations that it was important to get their names reserved too. The reputation at the time was that it was yuppies photographing their meals!

|
Embed
antonzuiker
antonzuiker

@frankm I did ‘Your 5-minute, 5-day orientation to Twitter' in 2012, & Blogging101 in 2001 (maybe 2002) - mistersugar.com/2012/05/2... - I talked much about social media in early days, sometimes feel guilty about it all.

|
Embed
smokey
smokey

@manton @frankm ABC News did a story on the evening news last year explaining how to use Snapchat (I think some of that is generational, but, still…).

Also, doing something on the open web is always going to be more “complicated” than a closed, limited silo (because you’re going to have choices and options), but that doesn’t mean it’s wrong to try the open, web way, or that there shouldn’t be articles to help people out as they move from one thing to a similar-but-slightly-different thing. :-)

|
Embed
kitt
kitt

@manton Oooooooooo! My first bug to fix, perhaps? ;)

|
Embed