manton
manton

Ghost in their weekly update, joking about likes:

Descartes famously said โ€œI think, therefore I amโ€ โ€” but it wasnโ€™t until several years later when we started getting likes on Instagram that we collectively came to the realization that the meaning of life, in fact, revolves around a consistent stream of dopamine hits from the internet.

Micro.blog doesnโ€™t have likes and for better or worse, Iโ€™m standing by that decision.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
eludom
eludom

@manton I'd hit the like button on that post if I could.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@eludom Sure, but I'm much happier receiving an actual reply. Worth 100 likes. ๐Ÿ™‚

|
Embed
Progress spinner
pratik
pratik

@manton ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฝ I firmly believe that โ€˜likesโ€™ changes how and what a person writes.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
drose
drose

@manton I like that. I really not having likes.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
artkavanagh
artkavanagh

@manton ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jzfski
jzfski

@manton I love mb for this

|
Embed
Progress spinner
JimRain
JimRain

@manton It's definitely for better. Actually conversing with someone, instead of tapping a button, is one of the great benefits of micro.blog.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
leeS
leeS

@manton Stay the course. Weโ€™re with you!

|
Embed
Progress spinner
notunremarkable
notunremarkable

@manton like

|
Embed
Progress spinner
kjz
kjz

@manton Absolutely the right approach ๐Ÿ‘

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@pratik That's a good point.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@drose Glad to hear it, thanks!

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@artkavanagh Thanks. ๐Ÿ‘

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@jzfski Thank you!

|
Embed
Progress spinner
cygnoir
cygnoir

@manton This is a defining feature of Micro.blog, for me, and I'm so happy that you stand by this decision.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@JimRain Thanks, I think so too. A real interaction is just worth more, even if it is less frequent than a like click.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@cygnoir Thanks so much.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jthingelstad
jthingelstad

@manton โ€œlikesโ€, follower counts, and algorithmic timelines are the path to narcissism.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@notunremarkable ๐Ÿ™‚

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
manton
manton

@kjz Thank you. ๐Ÿ‘

|
Embed
Progress spinner
eludom
eludom

@manton That was an attempt a dry humor ...

|
Embed
Progress spinner
davidshead
davidshead

@manton โค๏ธ

|
Embed
Progress spinner
briandigital
briandigital

@manton I'll be the one to represent the opposite opinion: I think private likes (visible to only the author) would help people receive encouragement to stick with this "shouting into the void" hobby.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@eludom Oh yeah, I read it that way.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
numericcitizen
numericcitizen

@briandigital I agree and wrote about this a while ago. cc @manton

|
Embed
Progress spinner
the
the

@briandigital @manton But would a possible compromise be to let the author of a post choose to whether to allow โ€œlikesโ€ (and default it to not allow them)? And also to make them only visible to the author?

|
Embed
Progress spinner