manton
manton

My post yesterday about Sam Altman has been pretty well received. Not everyone agrees, which is totally fine! We’ll see how the post ages in a year. I tried to put significant thought into it, though, not just fire off another hot take into the “love AI / hate AI” debate chaos.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
apoorplayer
apoorplayer

@manton I appreciate the thought you put into that post. My personal issue with it is that the lens through which you are looking at the issue is too narrow. I might suggest you put the same amount of thought into adjacent issues such as how AI is affecting data privacy, education, creativity, copyright, the environment, and the simple fact that it is being thrust into every aspect of technology we mere mortals use every day without our knowledge or consent. Google, Meta, Microsoft, and most large tech companies have already shown us the consequences technology can have on the larger culture. Sam Altman is following the same playbook IMO.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
jsonbecker
jsonbecker

@manton I sort of feel like your judging Sam by a different set of criteria than the important critiques– which are “Is he actually any good at product?”

That’s not clear to me. He’s good at raising money, amassing power, talking a huge game, and living and breathing Silicon Valley thinking (but not cartoonishly). But I’m not convinced that translate to the kind of product leadership required to not make the Rabbit R1.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@jsonbecker It’s a good question. And it’s hard to tell with OpenAI because their approach seems to be: let a bunch of small teams just work on their own things and then ship it. There is not exactly the cohesive vision we’re used to from other companies.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@apoorplayer Thanks for your thoughts. Covering privacy and education would be a whole different post. I’m definitely thinking about it, although I don’t know if I have anything to add right now.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
rscottjones
rscottjones

@manton Have you read this?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@rscottjones I’ve only skimmed it. Going to read the full paper today.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@pratik Thank you.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jasraj
jasraj

@rscottjones thank you for sharing, I’ve bookmarked this for reading on my flight later.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jasraj
jasraj

@pratik I agree. Also, hey again, Pratik 👋

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Munish
Munish

@manton Thanks for writing and sharing. I found this really interesting. I have thought about this for a while and I think if Apple, were not such a huge company, they would have already announced a merger of Open AI to fast track it back to the top of innovation and not just the bank balance. Imagine Sam ( Similar to Jobs) and Jonny inspiring the future of tech.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@Munish Thanks! Yeah, OpenAI is now too big to acquire. They could still potentially get Anthropic, but that would cost a small fortune too, and might not help in the same way.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Munish
Munish

@manton a merger was more likely, if Apple were desperate. I just do not think Apple can afford to be this far behind.

|
Embed
Progress spinner