pyrmont
pyrmont

@manton Speaking of Markdown flavors, does Micro.blog support any?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@pyrmont Just regular Markdown right now. What kind of features would you like to see from some of the other Markdown flavors?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Bruce
Bruce

@manton Not for short posts, but for longer pieces on hosted sites, footnotes would be cool.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@Bruce Ah, footnotes are a good example. Thanks!

|
Embed
Progress spinner
ismh
ismh

@manton yeah, MultiMarkdown would be legit.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jmreekes
jmreekes

@manton I agree with @ismh

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@jmreekes @ismh Noted, thanks!

|
Embed
Progress spinner
clonezone
clonezone

@ismh @manton +1 for MultiMarkdown.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
pyrmont
pyrmont

@manton I agree with @Bruce that the scenarios I could see myself wanting it would be for longer blog posts. For me, I think GFM would be what I’d hope to be able to use.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Bruce
Bruce

@clonezone @ismh @manton Another vote for MultiMarkdown. Though the full suite might be overkill (citations, CriticMarkup, File Transculsion, and the like).

|
Embed
Progress spinner