manton
manton

I thought our Standard.site support was broken, but then remembered it only works when Micro.blog is configured to embed previews for links. Updated the help page of Bluesky technical bits to document this.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
dave
dave

@manton I wonder if it makes sense to try to implement standard.site in the context of rss.chat?

My brain is so overloaded with formats and protocols these days, not sure if that question even means anything.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@dave Maybe. If there was a connection between an RSS.chat post and a Bluesky post, then that could work. It would mean adding some AT Protocol plumbing to RSS.chat, though.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
dave
dave

@manton — the plumbing could be anywhere. And I thought standard.site didn’t have the limits of Bluesky? Docs can have style, links, more than 300 chars, titles, can be edited, etc. that’s more important than the plumbing. I’m interested in eliminating the barriers.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@dave That’s right, it’s really designed for long-form blog posts. There would probably need to be something that copied the RSS.chat posts via AT Protocol to Bluesky (or another personal data server).

|
Embed
Progress spinner
MitchWagner
MitchWagner

@manton I have wondered about that. I activated link previews. We’ll see how it looks on my next long post.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@MitchWagner Great, let me know if it doesn’t look right on Bluesky for your next post.

|
Embed
Progress spinner