manton
manton

One reason web development appeals to me is that while it can be complicated, it doesn’t have to be. You can build for the web like it’s 1995. For native apps, the complexity is required with tools, code signing, stores. Thinking about this as I wait for my code to be crunched and uploaded to Apple.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
SimonWoods
SimonWoods

@manton I realised I was planning updates to TIL in a bad way — basically mimicking app development with the big release and version numbers and so on — and the biggest change I've made over the past few months is switching to the better way of the web: make changes when they are ready and hold announcements for when it's really worth grabbing people's attention.

Not only feels better but I've made a bunch of much better decisions about the project as a whole. All of those complicated parts of native apps mostly feels excessive to me and seems to be mostly weighted against the best interests of people who want to actually use the software.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
alexsavin
alexsavin

@manton true, until Chromekit is able to run plain html / css we should be fine

|
Embed
Progress spinner
pratik
pratik

@manton Didn't a large company like Facebook try this in its early days during the transition to mobile and then eventually give in in lieu of native apps?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
jmanes
jmanes

@manton I was thinking similar thoughts yesterday while working on my blog theme. It turns out you don’t need JavaScript to make something nice. So many approaches are available to us.

|
Embed
Progress spinner