Apple’s new rules for linking out of an app are totally unacceptable. The whole point of the court ruling is that we shouldn’t have to play these games. I’m not going to opt-in to Apple’s terms and probably no developers will.

@manton ... for the luxury of providing an external link to your own payment system, are they forcing people to use their IAP? Did I read that correctly?

@manton I’m quite disillusioned with Apple at the moment. They seem to be an incredibly greedy and entitled streak.

@SimonWoods The beginning is a little vague but I don’t think IAP is required. But Apple still wants a 27% cut and to audit your books.

@manton I'm no dev, but when I saw this, I re-read it a few times and still was scratching my head. How or why can Apple do this? Really? I don't think I understand. It seems...spiteful or greedy? Maybe it's legal, but still.

@manton @SimonWoods It is not vague to my non developer eyes. In the 'Requesting an entitlement' section the 2nd point to get an entitlement is use IAP when distributed through the App Store in the US.

@manton the point was to allow a possibility to link outside and that’s exactly what is now possible. You may not like the final result but if I were Apple I also wouldn’t give an inch to this Tim Sweeney asshole.

@manton from a user perspective I want to use IAP. I do not want to give out my payment details.
That said I subscribed to MB directly on the website.
But only because MB is a website first, app second service.
I would expect payment over IAP for every app first, website second/non existent service.

@manton For media (books, music, movies) I do not see how the appstore makes them more secure. I think 12% maximum apple fee.

@meaningful_jan No, the point was to allow a link to alternative payment methods outside the store. Apple is allowing a link but still forcing payment. I'm sure the judge didn't even consider Apple would do this because it's so ridiculous and against the spirit of the ruling.

@idnovic I don't disagree with that necessarily. The main point of allowing external payments is for existing services (like Micro.blog!) that get little to no value from App Store discovery. Games and other popular apps should continue to use IAP.

@manton at my job managing a mobile apps team for an enterprise SaaS company, their reviewer once followed our logo on a web view, to go into the main website and found the paid accounts options. They blocked our app saying we had to make those available through IAP. We had to remove the web view.

@danmurrelljr Ugh. After hearing similar stories, I'm always careful not to link anywhere. Of course it mostly hurts users.

@manton Interesting. 😕 I then and now ponder going Apple when fed up with the flaws and annoyances of desktop Linux and mobile Android environments. It's things like this to remind me why I so far haven't done that. 😬

@manton we just wanted to have a new user sign up form, but they wanted 30% of any of those users if they eventually signed up for a paid plan for their business. These included $300/mo and “call us” enterprise plans. I spent a while on the phone with Apple and they won’t budge. Had to remove it

@SimonWoods It's because I mentioned "Android" on the website — because Gluon was available on both iOS and Android. I think Apple have really hit a low point now, so petty and incredibly fucking stupid and childish. cc: // @manton

@manton I don't even sell anything through Apple's stores and this sort of thing makes me think "well, _could_ I use Linux all the time?”.

@manton
I am a developer, and when I select Xcode -> New project... I think how this will be profitable after Apple's 30% cut.

As a user, I do not want to give my card number to strangers.

As a developer, I want my users to feel safe and comfortable.

@manton Yes that is right. Apple Mafia needs money 😅.