manton
manton

Mark Zuckerberg wrote an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal yesterday that didn’t seem to get much attention. Hard not to read it as anything but a veiled critique at Anthropic:

The notion that AI is so dangerous that the only safe path is an extreme concentration of power seems dangerous. Historically, hoping that an absolute power will benevolently provide for humanity if sufficiently enlightened hasn’t led to safe or positive outcomes.

The irony is that Meta has itself created an extreme concentration of power in the web.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
numericcitizen
numericcitizen

@manton I don’t give a iota of credibility to this guy.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@numericcitizen My current theory about Mark is that subconsciously he wishes he had created a platform company and not an advertising business. Many conflicts and mistakes are because of this.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bloftin2
bloftin2

@manton It’s almost like a child (emotionally) was given too much money and influence.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
SciPhi
SciPhi

@manton he had a platform but decided that fair play wasn’t actually good when he could print money via advertising (& suppressing unpaid content), so all the apps got run out of Dodge

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bax
bax

@manton Lots to say about Facebook, but they are pretty great regarding open source. Hopefully that continues in AI

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@bax I expect it’ll continue. Definitely they’ve open sourced so much. React Native is a huge one.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@SciPhi Yeah, that’s a good summary of it.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
rom
rom

@manton ZuckA missing this hype wave and here he is trying to sound like he is good. LOL

|
Embed
Progress spinner
deepak@mastodon.nl
deepak@mastodon.nl

@manton that’s the problem with the lot of them. It’d be a diametrically opposite position if they were the ones that had a leading frontier model.

|
Embed
Progress spinner