JohnPhilpin
JohnPhilpin
This is one of 8 Tests - so you can safely ignore them - unless you are helping me understand how much of an idiot I might be … Test Link: john.philpin.com … and some punctuation, like this! First Four … from the Mac Test One - Using ‘Post Direct’ Test Two - Using ‘Post Pause’ Test Three - ... john.philpin.com
|
Embed
Progress spinner
JohnPhilpin
JohnPhilpin

Just noticed that all my 'more' tags are broken on the 8 test posts

I used <!--more-->

but the html code is being over written by 'symbols code' ... sorry - don’t know what its official name is - you know where something like ':' is represented by 4 characters ?

Is this related to the problem raised earlier @manton ?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@JohnPhilpin I think the comment should be on a line all by itself so the engine doesn’t mistake it for markdown.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@JohnPhilpin @bkryer I haven't heard of this, but looking at your post, it looks like the dashes have been converted to an mdash. This happens to me sometimes too and I need to go back and retype to make sure it's two dash characters.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@manton Great point, it’s a very common feature in editors for autocorrecting dashes and quotes and such. @JohnPhilpin, maybe a contributing factor?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
manton
manton

@bkryer @JohnPhilpin Yep. The related thing that trips me up is -> being converted to a real arrow →.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
JohnPhilpin
JohnPhilpin

@manton Thankyou … one of those straight quotes versus fancy quotes problems … see, this is why we can’t have nice things … I will double check … but it arrived there by ‘copy and paste’.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
JohnPhilpin
JohnPhilpin

Spot on Manton … Thankyou. Still don’t get how the copy and paste went wrong .. but now added to my TextExpander.

// @manton @bkryer

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@JohnPhilpin The white rabbit of text manipulation beckons. Here are some real world spoilers:

Markdown can be considered a dialect of HTML with all the complications that dialect translations pose, both to human editors and the processing software employed. So always get a receipt, ie a rendered preview.

Text editors generally lean to one or the other side of the writer/programmer perspective. This informs much about their conceptualization of the work to be done and how to do it. If available, read those Our Philosophy blog posts.

Text editors also do things to pasted text that you might not expect or want and the details vary widely. Many strip out everything that isn’t plaintext, so a copy grab of a webpage will lose links and of course formatting—maybe.

Text editors have defaults for file types and related behaviors. Conversions can be surprising. If I use one of my favorite tools, DEVONThink, to convert an html page to markdown then each image is converted into a base64 encoding. Nice, didn’t lose the images. But wait—the file size went from 125kb to 10megs! Oh yeah, base64 is text!

Auto conversion of punctuation marks reduced itself to a personal global approach for me. Either I’ll let the machine “correct” everything so the words are beautiful and then I check for “programmatic” info encoded in punctuation and “re-correct” as needed, OR I enter “manually” the desired marks. I chose the former, but it’s really a question of what you can keep in your fingers.

What about character sets?…. Oh the hole goes deeper…where’s that flashlight?

|
Embed
Progress spinner