frankm
frankm

SCOTUS’ ruling on gerrymandering may be as bad as Citizens United, and another nail in the coffin of the Republic. We now have a Supreme Court that serves to only fulfill the wishes of Republicans.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
Cheri
Cheri

@frankm I'm frustrated by the ruling. I guess we're in a state-by-state battle to make gerrymandering illegal? A slower road, for sure.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
ddykstal
ddykstal

@Cheri It will probably take amendments to state constitutions to get it nearly irrevokable, making it even slower.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
frankm
frankm

@Cheri Current make of SCOTUS suggests it will punt anything controversial to the states. Roe v. Wade will likely be declared overeach and reverted to the states to decide for themselves.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
frankm
frankm

@ddykstal You are right however, what is really being asked is for the parties to police themselves. I am skeptical that either party will give up the power to protect itself through gerrymandering which is why this is an instance where the courts should have made a decision. Republicans have been executing on a clear strategy to preserve itself despite not being a majority.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Bruce
Bruce

@frankm The really dispiriting part is that the Democrats were moving in the direction of reform. Now, they (and the grassroots) are stuck between reform in the blue states—giving Republicans an even bigger edge in the House—or gerrymandering as ruthlessly as the Republicans. 😕

|
Embed
Progress spinner