eludom
eludom
Private communications is not a technical problem curious.port111.com
|
Embed
Progress spinner
toddgrotenhuis
toddgrotenhuis

@eludom signal 👍

|
Embed
Progress spinner
eludom
eludom

@toddgrotenhuis Signal is good, and I've only done a little reading about, but I think:

Good - end to end encryption - Signal unable to see the content at all, so it can't be asked to filter or disclose

Bad - Still centralized servers, do DDoS, network blocking, gov takedown of the whole service possible - Not sure of their $ model, it takes a lot of money to run servers, networks​

|
Embed
Progress spinner
eludom
eludom

@eludom @toddgrotenhuis I'm trying to understand nostr arcitecture. Here's a good thread that goes into some of it, as well as long discussions about the social issues, prior art (KaZaA, IRC, etc) and the problems they faced:

news.ycombinator.com/item

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
toddgrotenhuis
toddgrotenhuis

@eludom true. There is some sense of distributed resiliency in that the protocol is implemented multiple places, not just in Signal itself.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
eludom
eludom

@toddgrotenhuis My understanding was that the client code is available, but signal does not publish their server code?

|
Embed
Progress spinner