@peterimoore I don’t think it’s any worse than any of the others, I just think the others are more similar to each other.
The Hugo template engine is mostly just an extension of the golang templating stuff
@peterimoore, I think this:
> seasoned developers — which I’m not — having frustration with it
summarizes my expericences pretty well. In the end I was able to solve nearly all of my issues, but the way to get there needs more energy then I think it should. And I don’t think I had these issues with jekyllrb. But it is just to slow when you have more then five posts in you’re blog :-( And I think in the end every system has it’s quirks.
@peterimoore you don’t need to know any golang. In the same way you don’t need any ruby to use jekyll
@peterimoore any speific reason which you like from Zola? I’ve only had a short look at the page right now it looks rather close to Hugo from what I’ve seen.
@peterimoore @V_ Did I also read it has no dependencies? That has a deep appeal. I tried to manage my own SSG site in the past and depency management meant I often was trying to fix something.
@toddgrotenhuis, yes, in this regard, it’s the same as Hugo. And that is certainly an aspect I like of Hugo. I don’t want to remember how many times I needed to fix my ruby gems with Jekyll Oo (until I moved it into Docker, but that made it still slower).