arstechnica@mastodon.social
arstechnica@mastodon.social

Microsoft in damage-control mode, says it will prioritize security over AI

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella is now personally responsible for security flaws.

arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20

|
Embed
Progress spinner
pauliehedron@infosec.exchange
pauliehedron@infosec.exchange

@arstechnica

KEK. LMAO even. ageblobcat

|
Embed
Progress spinner
depereo@mastodon.social
depereo@mastodon.social

@arstechnica if he's responsible how will he be held accountable?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Kierkegaanks@beige.party
Kierkegaanks@beige.party

@arstechnica but at the same time we know microsoft is full of shit based on 40 years of business practises

|
Embed
Progress spinner
AndyGER@mastodon.social
AndyGER@mastodon.social

@arstechnica Get out of here and get lost, Microsoft ...

|
Embed
Progress spinner
DrakkenZero@retro.pizza
DrakkenZero@retro.pizza

@arstechnica

"personally responsible for security flaws" makes it sound like he's the one going in there and adding them on purpose

|
Embed
Progress spinner
fmhilton@mastodon.sdf.org
fmhilton@mastodon.sdf.org

@arstechnica This is a good reason to not keep anything important in the cloud-if MS can screw over the government, then private citizens have no defense. The hackers don't care.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
artemesia@techhub.social
artemesia@techhub.social

@arstechnica

If they really mean it, Microsoft's CEO will be gone before Boeing's.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
timoj@mastodon.online
timoj@mastodon.online

@arstechnica So, they’re moving to *nix?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
kboyd@phpc.social
kboyd@phpc.social

@DrakkenZero @arstechnica Do we have any evidence that that isn't the case?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
alloydflanagan@me.dm
alloydflanagan@me.dm

@arstechnica How about they start by rehiring the whistleblower, and firing everyone who knew about the vulnerability and didn’t get it fixed?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
gooba42@mastodon.social
gooba42@mastodon.social

@arstechnica Does that mean he goes to jail when the AI gets somebody killed or does it just mean he's personally obligated to be the one apologizing when it happens?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
rickcogley
rickcogley

@arstechnica especially concerning given their many security certifications. If such a bad system can be released, it means none of their purported security controls are effective. Smh

|
Embed
Progress spinner
binaryphile@fosstodon.org
binaryphile@fosstodon.org

@arstechnica That's completely meaningless, as CEO he was *already* responsible for it. It's a deflection of responsibility to imply that he wasn't, he's simply avoiding accountability for the past.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
oheso@ieji.de
oheso@ieji.de

@arstechnica So we're all fucked, is it?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
kcivey@mastodon.social
kcivey@mastodon.social

@arstechnica How can an article about Microsoft saying it will prioritize security over AI have no mention of Recall?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
birdpoof@universeodon.com
birdpoof@universeodon.com

@arstechnica

No matter what happens, he's getting a golden parachute.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.social
nazokiyoubinbou@mastodon.social

@arstechnica What's that sound? Sounds like a bus coming...

|
Embed
Progress spinner
systemadminihater@cyberplace.social
systemadminihater@cyberplace.social

@arstechnica Hopefully he'll turn off the cricket and go to work.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
nuthatch@infosec.exchange
nuthatch@infosec.exchange

@arstechnica @fay59 FINALLY

|
Embed
Progress spinner
SaftyKuma@mastodon.social
SaftyKuma@mastodon.social

@arstechnica

Lol. Whatever.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
nutmeg@toot.io
nutmeg@toot.io

@arstechnica
Do they seriously think anybody believes these notorious liars?

|
Embed
Progress spinner