pratik
pratik

Got a nice sear on the sirloin fajita meat yesterday

|
Embed
Burk
Burk

@pratik Amazing looking!

|
Embed
gdp
gdp

@pratik Nice! I’ve been doing a lot of smoking and grilling during the shutdown. Pork butts, ribs, steaks caveman style. Lots of experimenting.

|
Embed
Gabz
Gabz

@pratik 🤤🤤🤤🤤

|
Embed
paulcraig901
paulcraig901

@pratik You’re the hero we need right now.

|
Embed
tones
tones

@pratik oh that looks good :p

|
Embed
bradenslen
bradenslen

@pratik Oh that looks really good.

|
Embed
lauralo
lauralo

@pratik that looks so tasty 😊

|
Embed
schuth
schuth

@pratik Looks fantastic!

|
Embed
In reply to
pratik
pratik

@Burk @Gabz @tones @bradenslen @lauralo @schuth Thanks. C'mon over next time. Wish I could send some via Zoom :)

@gpittman caveman style? Please share.

@paulcraig901 Am I an Avenger now?

|
Embed
gdp
gdp

@pratik Caveman style is cooking directly on the coals. It’s a bit of a gimmick and I won’t bother with it again. Not that it doesn’t work, just that there’s not much of a benefit.

For steaks, I reverse sear. So I cook slowly until the steak is about 10° or so shy of the target temperature. Then I raise the temperature of the grill and sear both sides. On this particular occasion, for the sear, I placed the steaks directly on the very hot coals.

|
Embed
pratik
pratik

@gpittman Ah! Interesting. I'm tempted to try it. Typically, I do it sous vide and then couple of minutes of sear on a hot skillet which now I think is the virtual opposite of caveman.

|
Embed
gdp
gdp

@pratik No! That’s perfect! The sous vide followed by the sear at the end is the reverse sear method. The only difference here is that the sear would happen on the coals. But if you sous vide first, there’s very little reason to spend the time and energy to get a fire going for a 2-minute sear.

|
Embed
pratik
pratik

@gpittman As it gets hotter in Texas, the inclination to get the grill going for basically cook for 5-7 minutes gets less and less so I get it :)

|
Embed