adders
adders

A good rule to keep online debate constructive is “play the ball, not the man”. If you attack the poster, not the ideas, you’re playing the man.

Mullenweg’s response to DHH is pure playing the man, not the ball.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
patrickrhone
patrickrhone

@adders He actually makes a good point once he gets around to talking about the Trademark stuff and making the comparison to Rails.

But, yes, it is lost in all the personal shade.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
adders
adders

@patrickrhone Indeed - the problem here has always been not what he’s doing - which I don’t have strong opinions on either way - but the way he’s behaving while doing it.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
adders
adders

@kjz There's an archive of it.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
adders
adders

@kjz Yes. I think the surprise is just because people expected better of Matt and Automattic. Many of the other suspects are behaving exactly as expected.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
adders
adders

@kjz I had a few (online) encounters with him in the mid to late 2000s, and he always seemed like a fairly decent chap. So, this has been… unexpected.

|
Embed
Progress spinner