jayeless
jayeless

Some Thoughts on Dark Mode: jayeless.net

|
Embed
Progress spinner
artkavanagh
artkavanagh

@jayeless @leonp @AlanGMarz Jessica wrote:

>I can’t stand most layouts that put bright text on dark backgrounds, so I don’t use dark mode.

I’ve certainly noticed over recent years that most sites now use some approximation of black text on a white background. I find it (relatively) boring and samey but, more to the point, I’d just like to get away from the ā€œprinted pageā€ metaphor. So, I’m generally guilty of using light coloured text on a darker background. I hope that people don’t find it hard to read but I think that font weight, line length and line height make more of a difference to readability. And there’s always Reader View.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
artkavanagh
artkavanagh

@leonp Thanks for the comment. I’ll think about the contrast. I’ve considered darkening the background a little bit but it’s so easy to mess things up that I’m cautious about changing things.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
jayeless
jayeless

@leonp Thank you. I had no idea CSS had that feature, and it looks interesting, although still not quite as detailed as letting people set their own preferred UI colours in a setting. The spottiness of browser implementations also poses an issue, as you say.

@Alangmarz When I visit your blog it’s set to light mode by default, so I hadn’t even noticed! 😊 It’s great to give options to people though, I think, and ā€œlight grey on dark greyā€ shouldn’t be too high-contrast for a dark mode.

@artkavanagh I had been going to talk a little more about the ā€œsameynessā€ of much of the modern web, but it wasn’t really about dark mode so I took it out… I do agree though, it’s refreshing to see some people doing more unique things than the one-column black-on-white (even if I don’t have an issue with that kind of layout per se… it’s just that it’s everywhere now).

|
Embed
Progress spinner