joshuapsteele
joshuapsteele

This made me pause while reading Kingsnorth, “Against the Machine” (p239): “… because Christian tradition has long taught that the emergence of one global religion […] will be the prelude to the coming of the figure known as Antichrist.” I don’t think that “long taught” is true?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
cjhubbs
cjhubbs

@joshuapsteele I mean you’re the trained theologian here, but in my understanding that’s more of a dispensationalist invention than some long church tradition.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
ReaderJohn
ReaderJohn

@joshuapsteele I don’t recall any such teaching in the Church in which Kingsnorth and I both are communicants.

I do recall something rather opposite: that the Church’s eschatology is “from thence He shall come to judge the living and the dead; whose kingdom shall have no end.”

|
Embed
Progress spinner
joshuapsteele
joshuapsteele

@cjhubbs I mean, certainly in the way Kingsnorth goes on to describe “Antichrist” and “global religion”, it sounds like the much more recent dispensationalist/Left Behind crap…

|
Embed
Progress spinner
JohnBrady
JohnBrady

@joshuapsteele No such teaching in Orthodoxy unless I’m greatly mistaken. I think some of Revelation can be read in this way, and lots of other ways! The book of Revelation is the only part of the NT that isn’t appointed to be read in church.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
cjhubbs
cjhubbs

@joshuapsteele Yep, exactly.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
joshuapsteele
joshuapsteele

@cjhubbs @JohnBrady @ReaderJohn Yeah, I’m 99% sure fears about a “one-world religion” don’t go back before Dispensationalism. Anyways, I agree with Kingsnorth’s worries about “The Machine” in very broad brushstrokes, but have been quite disappointed with the book beyond its opening chapters…

|
Embed
Progress spinner
joshuapsteele
joshuapsteele

@joshuapsteele @cjhubbs @JohnBrady @ReaderJohn Also, have any of you read “The Name of the Rose” by Umberto Eco? Thinking about the history of interpreting Revelation reminded me of that book. What a wild ride.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
JohnBrady
JohnBrady

@joshuapsteele I liked it overall (= he agrees with me!) but thought it had some serious problems. When he gets into politics I wince. I think some of that has to do with time of writing/publication: Some of the draconian state measures during Covid are his prime examples of the Machine at work; though those feel pretty tame these days, what with unaccountable secret police roaming the streets etc.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
JohnBrady
JohnBrady

@joshuapsteele It’s been somewhere on my mental reading list for decades without ever rising to the top. Maybe I need to fix that…

|
Embed
Progress spinner
joshuapsteele
joshuapsteele

@JohnBrady It’s pretty great. A seminary professor assigned it as required pre-reading for his Medieval Theology course in our “History and Doctrine” sequence at Beeson.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
todd@social.lol
todd@social.lol

@joshuapsteele in the early parts of the book he seemed pretty happy with christendom attempts to be the one world religion? 🤷‍♂️ I'm not finding it to be super coherent.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
ReaderJohn
ReaderJohn

@joshuapsteele I haven’t read The Name of the Rose, though it was very popular when I wore a younger man’s clothes.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
frankm
frankm

@joshuapsteele Sure seems like economics is the one world religion currently in place that is viewed perhaps more dogmatically than any “religion” as commonly known. Further, if you take a view that the Book of Revelation is about Romeand the churches views towards it, I think one can see how the norm of civilization is still very much the norm.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
cjhubbs
cjhubbs

@frankm That’s a fascinating insight. Gonna chew on that one a bit.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
davoh
davoh

@joshuapsteele I’m just about to begin the book. Thanks for pointing that bit out. And no, it does not remind me of any long-established teaching of Christian churches.

|
Embed
Progress spinner