@jack Why to resign to the fact that you are going to rotate through the tools every three months or so and try to find a way to not make the changes too dramatic? You are going to continue to change tools, so I suggest to just embrace it.
@jack I’d say whatever gives you the most future-proof files. If they both provide that, then whichever workflow you like the best. If they still both provide that, flip a coin? 😆
@frankm I mostly convince myself that I've embraced it, but the transition period is always weird :).
@pimoore The coin flip has high value. In a split second you know which result you favor. The result of the flip is potentially moot.
@jack can you talk about your Emacs picture? Looks like you are using Hugo as the site generator, what org packages/tools are you using there?
@AndySylvester I'm using the ox-hugo package. I write every post as a new heading in the outline and ox-hugo kicks out Hugo-compatible Markdown files. It does a great job of letting me use Org mode for writing for a Hugo site. ox-hugo.scripter.co