mandaris
mandaris
Creating Labarum (Part 6): A Splash of Color mandarismoore.com
|
Embed
Progress spinner
Archimage
Archimage

@mandaris Nice

|
Embed
Progress spinner
mandaris
mandaris

@Archimage thank you. I was starting to feel like no one saw these.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Archimage
Archimage

@mandaris “Just because you think you are ignored doesn’t mean you don’t have an impact.” ;)

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@Archimage @mandaris Influence is a strange attractor ☘︎꩜❦❉

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Archimage
Archimage

@bkryer Influence is not impact.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Archimage
Archimage

@bkryer And yes, I got the pun. ;

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@Archimage Isn’t it though? If I suggest something and this something plays a role in someone else taking this or that action, well, that’s the impact.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Archimage
Archimage

@bkryer No. Influence is gentle/subtle. Impact is greater/more violent. Definitions matter.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@Archimage Huh. I don’t read it that way. Either it has an impact, subtle, overt, whatevs, or it does not have an impact. Influence is one way to have an impact on something. Another is force. Another is reason. Another is chance.

The degrees of each and all can be split as you care to.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@Archimage Or are we getting ourselves into trouble here with the tendency to turn verbs into nouns nouns into verbs?

[ edit, wait—take that, reverse it ]

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Archimage
Archimage

@bkryer If you don’t trust a definition, what do you trust?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@Archimage I trust it as far as I can throw it—er, know it. 🧐꩜

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@Archimage I guess I want 'impact' to be more noun-y, while today’s speaker hears it more verb-y. Uncontrollable phenomena are often vexing in this way.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Archimage
Archimage

@bkryer That’s a personal problem.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@Archimage As are all of them, really.

I just get the feeling you have put definitions in the domain of the sacrosanct, which I think is a mistake: consider, who writes them...?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@bkryer @Archimage ...a mistake because it leads to the kind of ridiculous thinking that says, if only everyone would use the right words at the right times we wouldn’t have any of these problems.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@Archimage and (missed this before) what was the pun?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
In reply to
Archimage
Archimage

@bkryer if you don’t know your own puns, I’m not about to inform you.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@Archimage I detect hostility. I think I can see a pun, and take a joke. I didn’t see the pun. It’s a genuine question.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Archimage
Archimage

@bkryer Hostility implies emotion. I have none. It’s not my job.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@Archimage Dude, you started this whole tangential thread by telling me, uninvited, that 'influence' is not 'impact'. Something prompted you to take that action. If not emotion, which I understand can be messy, than something else...maybe an idea you would be willing to share? Some string of thoughts leading us from whence to okay I get it now?

Or is the game to simply exhaust me?

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Archimage
Archimage

@bkryer You replied to me and my post, saying “Influence is a strange atttractor.” I responded influence is not impact. Your reply thread not mine. In any event, I apologize. Have a good day.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@Archimage I include all frequently in replies out of courtesy, but in this case also because I was agreeing with you. People tend to underestimate the influence they can have, and the impact that influence can have. I mean, jeez, a large portion of this country’s representation is being led around by relatively small nose rings and jack boots. Influence with impact.

[ edit: clarity (ha!) ]

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@mandaris This is quite tidy. I like the mechanicals as well as the mood (colors, fonts, etc).

|
Embed
Progress spinner
peterw
peterw

@mandaris I really like the neat lines and the colours. It's interesting to see what you've settled on. Thank you for sharing.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
gregmoore
gregmoore

@mandaris 👏🏻Really great job with the theme. The colors are really nice and all the pieces benefit from all the consideration you’ve given them.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
mandaris
mandaris

@bkryer thank you! I was trying to make it so that one could focus on the content.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
mandaris
mandaris

@gregmoore thank you! It means a lot coming from you. To be honest, when I saw your design, I felt like giving up because I thought yours was a better execution of what I wanted. But I kept with it for the sense of completion.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
bkryer
bkryer

@mandaris ❤︎ I think you’ve succeeded. It reads very clean without extra fuss but the page components are clear, plus the other attention to details of importance, intl. date/time for example, shows a careful crafting. And it’s snappy. Nice.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
Munish
Munish

@mandaris very nice theme and interesting posts.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
gregmoore
gregmoore

@mandaris I appreciate the compliment ☺️ I’m figuring it out as I go along and standing on the shoulders of others. I’m happy to share what I can. (I started with the Nord colors as well before tweaking a few because they work so well.)

|
Embed
Progress spinner
pimoore
pimoore

@mandaris You’ve worked really hard on this theme, and it shows. Great job, sir!

|
Embed
Progress spinner
mandaris
mandaris

@pimoore I really look to your example. I was thinking about adding the margin notes 🗒️ that you have for tufte, but I want to have a better understanding my edge cases first.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
pimoore
pimoore

@mandaris I’m humbled, thanks Mandaris. I still really like margin and side notes, despite them requiring shortcodes to work. That said, I’d love to figure out a different way entirely of doing footnotes using a semantic HTML solution. Unfortunately I just don’t believe there is, hence maybe the best solution being to avoid using them entirely. 🤷🏻‍♂️

|
Embed
Progress spinner
mandaris
mandaris

@pimoore I've been thinking about whaat you wrote and my own writing as well. I came across this one related to accessible footnotes but I'm afraid that I'd have to learn how to re-write the markdown rendering engine and then figuring out how to integrate it with micro.blog.

|
Embed
Progress spinner
pimoore
pimoore

@mandaris Without having read the full article yet (merely skimming), this just highlights even more that footnotes on the web are a huge pain point. The number of workarounds to get them displaying and working unobtrusively seems far too great. Truthfully, this makes me want to ditch them altogether. 😂

|
Embed
Progress spinner