@bix As I read his post, a topic Twitter advertised to me as tending was #karensgonewild. It was literally post after post going after people who had transgressed. There is a Jon Ronson book about it. I’m not sure pretending it isn’t a thing really works when so many anecdotes add up to data.
@bix I'd echo what @frostedechoes said (pun accidentally-intended). The Washington Post running a 3000 word major piece dragging up an incident of a non-public figure from two years ago leading to the loss of job/career would say differently. Among numerous other incidences.
Cancel culture is junk-food dopamine where the crowd gets to feel like they're dismantling racism whilst conveniently missing the bigger picture. It's hobby-politics.
"There's something unsustainable about an environment that demands constant atonement but actively disdains forgiveness."
@lucian Of course, that "junk-food dopamine where the crowd gets to feel like they're dismantling racism" originated with Black Twitter punching up at legit offenses.
@patrickrhone In the end, my position comes down to: like all things I'm sure there are abuses but as a straight, cisgender, middle-aged white guy I'm not about to condemn cancel culture of the outing of Karens writ large, and usually the sturm und drang against alleged mobs arises out of one part or another of the power structure bearing the brunt of the punching up. I'm okay with a skeptical eye, but I'm not okay with doing the dirty work of the powers-that-be who are scrambling to keep their barricades intact.
@bix @esjewett @frostedechoes Oh, absolutely, I agree. Just because something becomes (or looks liable to become) a runaway train does not mean it didn't have a (worthy and necessary) destination to begin with.
However it simply feels reckless to dismiss the potential ramifications and clumsy-negative habits formed from allowing something such as this to go unchecked, granted immunity and impunity to moonlight as progressive, protected from any inquiry or criticism by virtue of its virtuous beginning.
Things build from the bottom up, and because there is, and was, good in the beginning does not mean there is no room for misuse and when misuse becomes the norm the damage is done and must be unpicked in reluctant bashful hindsight.
@esjewett Yes, but when the oppressor becomes simply anyone at all that is other than the one/group that calls out the oppressing, you've lost sight of the actual villain:
"Where all are guilty, no one is; confessions of collective guilt are the best possible safeguard against the discovery of culprits, and the very magnitude of the crime the best excuse for doing nothing." —Hannah Arendt
@lucian We are probably talking past each other a bit due to my being cryptic. My point was simply that yes it’s clearly bad in many ways, but there is some virtue in it’s role in the current American conversation: to allow white people to experience some of the indiscriminate, disproportional, mob retribution that is a core part of the black experience in this country. Turns out, that’s a shitty thing to experience.
@esjewett I can see that, to an extent, except for me to accept it as a justified end would be to see the victims being only whites, which isn't the case. Everyone and anyone is fair-game, except when a rival mob turns the cancelling on one its own, when suddenly rules and bounds are now introduced. I also fail to see how a "see we ruined your life, it's not very nice is it?" can be the most efficacious tract to take towards a unifying of cause. The mob eats its own, directing its ire redundantly at those who were already on board. The criteria of admission to the "good-side" becomes increasingly small. Deviation from the line is tantamount to Dissent; dissent then tantamount to herecy; the punishment; exile.
@bix I don't decide whether I deem something to be, or have the potential to be, out of control based on whether the Atlantic say it is or isn't. Nor do I think anyone should. Nor do I think anyone should come to their conclusions based on the stance of any media organisation, public figure, random internet stranger, or the neighbourhood stray cat, and I don't mention the cat to be mocking, but merely to highlight the folly of guiding ourselves by the opinions and thoughts of others -- whoever they be.
@lucian I didn't say you did. I said you're making an even more ridiculous argument than the article which sparked all this off. 😉
@bix Thats fair.
Let's reconvene some time in the future and reasses how ridiculous the concern is based on how many more ridiculous incidents we have?
More like the data analyst social‐democrat-progressive who tweeted a single tweet summary of Princeton University's Omar Wasau's research done in the 60's that found violent protest tended to hurt the democratic cause and Black people, which subsequently led to the data analyst being fired from his job for doing so, and labelled racist for deigning to tweet the work of a Black Professor whose conclusions they didn't like.. Oh, nevermind that he also apologised for tweeting it either. (remember that line I keep tweeting about disdaining forgiveness?)
Oh, which was followed up, let's add, by white [Nathan Robinson(https://twitter.com/owasow/status/1273642987185147904?s=19) writing an article telling professor of said research why he was essentially "anti-black", for having done said research albeit without having actually read said research in question; the baying cries for cancelling him are eerily silent however.
@lucian Let’s recall, again, that this entire discussion was set off by Jacobs saying the following:
For the ones doing the mobbing, ruining the lives of innocent people is not a bug in their program, it’s an essential feature. There can be no reign of terror when only the guilty are punished.
That is why, for those who want to effect social change by exposure and shaming, punishing the innocent is a feature of their system, not a bug.
Which is what set me off. Nowhere have I argued that abuses don’t happen. The abuses, both the wrongly purported and the actual, quite clearly are being adjudicated and debated publicly. If only the situations in which true and actual racist behavior was called out were treated with this degree of furred brow pontification.
@lucian I hit send before I was done: what sent me scurrying to post to my blog was Jacobs’ contention that this is effectively the way some undefined “mob” wants it; to wit: “cancel them all and let god sort them out”, and there’s simply no evidence of that. An anecdote here or there doesn’t qualify. And in the scheme of things, giving precious and plaintive column inches to the wrongly accused, whether they were wrongly accused or not, just seems out of proportion in a society where all the racism that gets zero column inches every single day should maybe be the story.
@lucian Bookmarked for when I haven't just woken up from an accidental nap.
New Microblog — $5/month
We'll create and host a microblog for you at username.micro.blog or your own domain name. Includes cross-posting, pages, themes, and publishing from the web, iOS, and Mac.
Upgrade to Microcast + Video — $10/month
All the features of a hosted microblog plus podcast and video hosting. Upload MP3s via the web or use the companion iPhone app Wavelength to record and edit your own microcast. We'll create a podcast feed for you.
Upgrade to Teams — $20/month
Great for businesses or families. Add people to your blog so that your whole team can write blog posts. Also includes podcasting and video upload.