jack
jack
Friends vs Followers on Micro.blog jack.baty.net
|
Embed
cn
cn

@jack IQ tests prove youโ€™re good at IQ tests

|
Embed
eli
eli

@jack ๐Ÿ™Œ this 100 times over

|
Embed
hjertnes
hjertnes

@jack ๐Ÿ˜

|
Embed
devilgate
devilgate

@jack Yes! Yes! 100% agree. I hope @manton never adds follower counts.

|
Embed
bbohling
bbohling

@jack well said friend :)

|
Embed
In reply to
TheTechHomie
TheTechHomie

@jack I really like this post. I also really like the fact that you cannot tell how many people a certain person has. Like you said, it almost improves the general conversation/content on micro.blog. I've learned a fair amount by stumbling around here.

|
Embed
jack
jack

@TheTechHomie Thanks, and same here. So many people have so much to teach me and I believe it's in no way related to follower counts.

|
Embed
smokey
smokey

@jack A couple of times while drafting, I thought about talking about the follower count stuff, but I'm glad I didn't, because you did a much better job than I would have :-)

|
Embed
jack
jack

@smokey Loved your post, thanks. This is a pretty great place.

|
Embed
tones
tones

@jack Great piece Jack. The lack of public stats is a huge draw for me too.

|
Embed
jack
jack

@tones Thank you. I'm rather surprised by how much not having follower counts has added to my experience here. I like it.

|
Embed
iKeating
iKeating

@jack spot-on๐Ÿ‘

|
Embed
bitdepth
bitdepth

@jack You make some great points. I had internalized the stats even though I told myself they didn't matter. Focussing on the people and the ideas is so much better.

|
Embed
manton
manton

@jack Thanks for your thoughts on follower counts. I really do think avoiding the numbers game is important. We're going to stick with it.

|
Embed
SimonWoods
SimonWoods

@jack My own nodding-with-agreement continued on from @Smokey's post right through yours. :)

|
Embed